Patna High CourtCWJC/4111/2015dismissed

Md. Mashroob Kausar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-26Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4111 of 2015 ====================================================== Md. Mashroob Kausar son of Md. Quasim, resident of village Siktihar, Post office Sontha, Police- Station Bahadurganj, District Kishanganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Education Secretariat Building, Patna -1

2. The District Education Officer, Kishanganj.

3. The Mukhiya Gram Panchyat Raj Jhiljhili, post office and Police - station Bahadurganj, District Kishanganj. null null

4. The Panchyat Secretary, Gram Panchyat Raj Jhiljhili, post office and Police - station Bahadurganj, District Kishanganj.

5. The Block Education officer, Bahadurganj, Post office and Police-Station Bahadurganj, Distt. Kishanganj.

6. The District Teacher's Employment- Appellate Authority, Kishanganj, Post office & Police-station and District Kishanganj

7. Tanzeem Raza son of Sidddique Alam, Assistant teacher, Bihar Education Project Primary School, Bentbari . No. 7 is resident of village Siktihar, Post office Sontha Police - Station Bahadurganj, District Kishanganj.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Najmul Hoda For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar No. 2- Sc17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 26-03-2015 Heard counsel for the parties.

There are two reasons for this Court for not interfering with the impugned order, as contained in Annexure 5. First reason is that the settled position cannot be unsettled at the asking and convenience of the petitioner. Selection was made in the year 2010. He had approached the Tribunal only in the year 2014 alleging that he had higher marks. The other reason is that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4111 of 2015 (2) dt.26-03-2015 2/2 petitioner did not participate in the counseling held, unluck became the reason for his non selection. Both the reasons are valid reasons for dismissing the writ application. Writ application stands dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) singh/- U