Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21068 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2023 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Ranjit Yadav Son of Mahendra Yadav R/V- Gadi Katauna, P.S.- Malaypur, District- Jamui 2.

Chandan Kumar Mandal Son of Kailash Mandal R/V Sono, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui 3.

Sudhir Yadav Son of Narayan Yadav R/V - Kolhua, P.S.- Khaira, DistrictJamui 4.

Pradip Kumar Son of Bharat Rawat R/V- Genadih, P.S.- Gidhaur, DistrictJamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the IPC in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.376 of 2023.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21068 of 2024(4) dt.24-09-2024 2/3 the informant with an allegation that on verification of the certificate of the petitioner it was found that the same was forged and fabricated, based on which they had applied in terms of advertisement no.02 of 2011 for appointment as Home Guard Jawan.

4. The learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that FIR came to be instituted based on an enquiry conducted behind their back. It is also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain their side of the case, perhaps the instant FIR would not have been instituted. It is also submitted petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21068 of 2024(4) dt.24-09-2024 3/3 connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.376 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T