← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23638/2018disposed

Md. Saifullah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-04-18Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23638 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Saifullah S/o M. Mahmood Ali, Resident of Dharmpur, P.S.DistrictSamastipur, retired as Associate Professor in the subject of Urdu, B.R.B College, Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4.

The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5.

The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6.

The Principal, B.R.B. College, Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the University :

Mrs. Alka Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-04-2023 Heard Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mrs. Alka Verma, learned counsel for the University and Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, learned AC to learned SC-16 for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that in supplementary counter affidavit, the respondents have admitted that entire payment has been made on account of retiral dues payable to the petitioner. However, the petitioner is still aggrieved as no interest has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.23638 of 2018(5) dt.18-04-2023 2/2 paid to the petitioner on account of delay caused in making payment.

3. Considering the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, it would be in the interest of justice to direct the respondents to make payment of interest on account of delayed payment on different heads of retiral dues, if admissible, within a period of three months from the date of production of this order.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/Nilmani U