← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22372/2021bail rejected

Barka Marandi @ Barku Marandi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22372 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2020 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== BARKA MARANDI @ BARKU MARANDI SON OF PATWARI MARANDI R/O VILLAGE- HRIDAY GANJ SANTHALI TOLA, P.S.- NAGAR SAHAYAK, DISTRICT- KATIHAR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Musowir, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 672 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned ADJ-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise Act), Katihar, District- Katihar in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

It is a case of recovery of about 10 liters of country made wine from the courtyard of the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22372 of 2021(4) dt.10-03-2022 2/2 Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In view of the fact that the said country made wine was recovered from the courtyard of the house of the petitioner, as such, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U