Kanhaiya Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10421 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2015 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Kanhaiya Chaudhary, aged about 45 years (Male), Son of Late Bharat Chaudhary Resident of Village - Belwar, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Raj Nagar P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution story in short is that the petitioner along with other accused persons, namely, Sanjay Chaudhary, Sonu Chaudhary and Bhago Devi have assaulted the Informant. In the case diary, though the Informant has supported his earlier version but, two of the witnesses, who are daughter-in-law as well as his son, have stated about assault by Sanjay Chaudhary by Lathi. Both the witnesses have not made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10421 of 2019(3) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 any specific allegation against the present petitioner. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Raj Nagar P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T