Shri Manik Pasi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.428 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-1989 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Shri Manik Pasi Son of Late Bodhu Pasi Resident of Village- Pali, P.S.- Kawakol, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Bihar State Sentence Remission Board through the Principal Secretary Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Inspector General, Prison and Reforms Services Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Additional Director General of Police, Crime and Investigation Department Bihar, Patna 6.

the Director, Parviksha Services, Bihar Patna 7.

The District and Sessions Judge, Nawada Bihar 8.

The Superintendent of Police, Nawada Bihar 9.

The Superintendent of Police, Central Jail, Gaya Bihar 10.

The Probation Officer, Department of Home, Nawada Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 29-02-2024 In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "This is a writ application in the nature of habeas corpus for commanding and directing the respondent authorities to release the petitioner from judicial custody keeping in

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.428 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 view that he has already served his jail sentence for about seventeen long years in judicial custody after being convicted in S.

Tr. No. 422/ 1991 arising out of Kawakol P.S. Case No. 30/ 1989 registered for the offences allegedly committed by him under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of IPC.

2. Reading of the relief it is evident that it would not fall under the definition of Habeas Corpus. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to file petition under relevant provision of law before the appropriate forum.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U