Vijay @ Vijay Sada @ Vijay Rishidev v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15024 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Vijay @ Vijay Sada @ Vijay Rishidev Son of Upendra Sada Resident of Village - Kadamkhadi, P.S. - Angarh, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024 dated 02.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 353, 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 02.02.2024 during night patrolling, when the police force reached Budhimari Karmkar tola, unknown miscreants who were armed with weapons, fired bullet and threw bomb upon police. It is further alleged that one police personnel, namely, Laltu Kumar got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15024 of 2025(2) dt.13-05-2025 2/3 injured while he was stopping dacoity which was being committed by the unknown miscreants in the house of one Manish Karmkar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Ranjeet Kumar and Rupesh Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The coaccused persons have already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46249 of 2024. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15024 of 2025(2) dt.13-05-2025 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T