Nawal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3263 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Nawal Kishore Singh Son of Late Saryug Singh resident of village - Fatehpur, P.O. Rajla, P.S. Kurhani, Town & District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

5. The Additional Collector, Muzaffarpur

6. The Deputy Collector ( Establishment ), Muzaffarpur

7. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, West Muzaffarpur

8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur null null .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag2-D.K. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 27-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner is permitted to implead the District Provident Officer as respondent no.9 in course of the day. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that exercise for payment of post retiral benefits appears to have been made but calculation chart has not been given to the petitioner regarding the payment of provident fund.

In above view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3263 of 2015 (3) dt.27-07-2015 2/2 with a direction to the District Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur, who is respondent No. 9, to supply the calculation chart with respect to payment of the post retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of four weeks.

In case, petitioner is dissatisfied with the calculation, he will be at liberty to make a representation before the respondent No. 9 which should be disposed of in accordance with law. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sudha/- U