← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/435/2023disposed

Dukhni Devi v. The Union Of India

2023-12-01Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.435 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4593 of 2015 ====================================================== Dukhni Devi Wife of Late Jugeshwar Mandal, Presently residing at VillageSahokha (Sahorba), P.O. and P.S. Laukaha, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

2.

Sri Alok Agrawal, Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 3.

Sri Sunil Kumar Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Divisional Engineer-1, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 4.

Sri R.R. Lakra Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 5.

Sri Rahul Raj Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 6.

Sri Adul Rahmat Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Assistant Divisional Engineer-II, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 7.

Sri K.k. Mishra Son of Name not known to the petitioner, at present Senior Section Engineer, P-Way, Jhanjharpur District- Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Dr. K.N. Singh, Sr. Advocate, ASG Mr. Praveen Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, JC to ASG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 01-12-2023 Perusal of the second supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 along with the documents, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, the proceeding of present M.J.C.-Contempt

Patna High Court MJC No.435 of 2023(6) dt.01-12-2023 2/2 petition stands dropped, reserving liberty to the petitioner in the event of any wrong calculation, he is permitted to approach the concerned authority in filing representation. If such representation is submitted, the concerned authority is hereby directed to examine the grievance of the petitioner and pass a speaking order in accordance with law.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Rajiv Roy, J) Vikash/- U