← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15194/2023allowed

Md. Salman Hussain @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-18Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15194 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== MD. SALMAN HUSSAIN @ SONU Son of Anwar Hussain @ Anwar Ali Resident of Village- Karpurwa Sai @ Sai Tola Koirpurwa, P.S.- Nagar, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 394, 395, 397, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, when informant was returning from Gaya and reached at Ismailpur Railway Station then two unknown miscreants came near the informant and caught hold the hand of the informant and another two persons started assaulting him. It is further alleged that on pistol point they looted cash of total Rs. 1,45,000/- one mobile and other articles from the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15194 of 2023(3) dt.18-05-2023 2/3 and fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is submitted that the petitioner was put on TIP but he was not identified by the informant that he was involved in the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that one motorcycle was recovered but the same belongs to the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16040 of 2023. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.11.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gaya Rail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15194 of 2023(3) dt.18-05-2023 3/3 P.S. Case No. 379 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Manishkumar/- U T