Bhaskar Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3995 of 2020 ====================================================== Bhaskar Kumar Sinha S/o Late Awadh Kumar Sharan Sinha, Resident of Mohalla - New Area Birar Road, P.O. Gaya, P.S. Civil Lines, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Executive Officer District Rural Development Authority, Gaya.

4.

The Director, Accounts Administration and Self Employment, D.R.D.A. Gaya.

5.

The Block Development Officer Dobhi District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyamal Krishna Sinha, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (Ga2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2024 Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State are present.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has been filed for directing the Respondent No. 5 to make payment of petitioner entire unpaid honorarium with effect from January 2017 to July 2017 for which he has filed representation on 20.09.2018 and remainder too, but till date no decision has been taken.

3. Counsel submits that the petitioner was selected as Executive Assistant to do the compilation work of Date Entry of the beneficiaries of Indra Aawas Yojana on the Official Website of the Government.

4. Petitioner submits that he joined and started

Patna High Court CWJC No.3995 of 2020(2) dt.12-01-2024 2/2 working with effect from 01.07.2014 and with the satisfaction of higher authorities, he was discharging his duties. But, all of sudden, the Block Development Officer, Dobhi, Gaya restraint the petitioner from discharging his duties.

5. In this regard, the petitioner has filed representation on 20.09.2018. He also filed another representation on 16.05.2019, but nothing happened.

6. Counsel for the State submits that petitioner may be directed to file fresh representation before the District Magistrate raising all his grievance which he has raised in this writ petition.

7. In the light of the submission made, let the petitioner be at liberty to file fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Gaya raising all his grievance which he has raised in this writ petition and District Magistrate, Gaya is directed to pass reasoned and speaking order considering the grievance of the petitioner and also assure the payment of the petitioner for which he is entitled as per his contract.

8. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U