Bhagat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14113 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2017 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
BHAGAT YADAV Son of Devnandan Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Laxmanwa, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran. 2.
Surendra Yadav Son of Bhagat Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Laxmanwa, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran. 3.
Supindra Yadav Son of Bhagat Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Laxmanwa, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran. 4.
Dhirendra Yadav @ Birendra Yadav Son of Dhupa Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Gulariya, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran.
5.
Manish Yadav Son Of Dhupa Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Gulariya, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran. 6.
Dhupa Yadav @ Dhrupa Yadav @ Dhupa Bhagat Yadav Son of Late Bipat Yadav Resident of Village - Ahirauliya Tola Gulariya, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, Dist.- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar No.Iii For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with G.R. Case No. 123 of 2017 arising out of Raxual P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections420, 423, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 193, 195, 120B, 147, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 225 of the Indian Penal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14113 of 2020(2) dt.14-07-2020 2/2 Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in connection with the present case on account of land dispute. It is further submitted that the present case has been lodged after lapse of three weeks. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing personal bail bonds to the satisfaction of SDJM, Raxual in connection with G.R. Case No. 123 of 2017 arising out of Raxual P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Jagdish/- U T