Amit Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11375 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2025 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Amit Pandey S/o- Sanjay Pandey Village- Howdih, P.S.-Nasriganj, DistrictRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 76, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that the accused persons including petitioner having armed with lathi, sharp edged weapon and pistol arrived at the place of occurrence. Petitioner is alleged to have fired two rounds which narrowly missed the hand of Aryan Pandey. Her husband and other family members were assaulted by accused persons with lathi due to which they got injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11375 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 case. Petitioner and informant are own gotia and land dispute is going on between them. There is case and counter case between both sides. The charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of absconding of the petitioner or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in jail since 14.08.2025 having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the parties, allegations against the petitioner and the facts that there is case and counter case between both sides, no injury was found to anyone, charge sheet has already been submitted and the period of custody undergone by him, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No.288 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T