← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16588/2016disposed

Ramesh Chandra Kapoor And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

2025-08-04Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16588 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Ramesh Chandra Kapoor 2.

Harish Chandra Kapoor 3.

Umesh Chandra Kapoor All sons of Late Prakash Chandra Kapoor All of resident of Mohalla-Pankha to 1 NitieshwarMarg. Ward No. 25 P.S. Kazi Mohammadpur, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India 2.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bi 3.

District Magistrate-cum-Collertor Muzaffarpur 4.

The Sub- Divisional Magistrate, East Muzaffarpur 5.

Anchal Adhikari Mushahari Anchal Mushahari District-Muzaffarpur 6.

Chandra Bhushan Prasad Son of Late Ramroop Prasad 7.

Manish Kumar @ Shanker Son of Chandra BHushan Prasad Respondent No. 6 and 7 resident of Mohalla- Pankha toli Niteshwar Marg. No. 25 P.S. KaziMohammadpur District-Muzafarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan-SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"A. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or directions commanding upon the respondents, Anchal Adhikari, Anchal Mushahari in the district of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16588 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 Muzafarpur not to dispose the petitioners from the land in question without initiating any land encroachment proceeding against the petitioner and restrain them from taking any Section against them from the same till disposal of this writ application.

B. to pass any such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court thinks fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he shall be approaching the respondent no. 5, the Circle Officer, Mushahari, Muzaffarpur for the redressal of the grievance.

4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U