Dev Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10162 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2016 Thana -KOTWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Dev Kumar Ram, son of Late Jyotik Ram, Resident of Village- Sobaiya Toli, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Kotwa P.S.Case No. 195 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has clean antecedent and there is alleged recovery of 8 litres of country made liquor from the petitioner and he has remained in custody for three months.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10162 of 2017 (2) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Kotwa P.S.Case No. 195 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U