Bhushan Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11765 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2020 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== BHUSHAN RAVIDAS S/o Late Keshar Ravidas R/o Village- Rahui, PostRahui, P.S.- Rahui, Distt- Nalanda, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No.464 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the informant with weapons and attacked on the wife of the informant. It is alleged that the wife of the informant died during the course of treatment.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11765 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the formal FIR but in the column 7 of the FIR, he has been made accused. He submits that the petitioner has been made accused in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case, which is clear from the impugned order from itself.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T