← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16071/2024allowed

Raja Saday v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-19Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16071 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2022 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raja Saday Son of Pawan Saday Resident of Vill.- Naulakha, P.S.- Bheja, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 363, 366(A), 506/34 of the IPC and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. 3.

As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that the F.I.R. named accused persons enticed his minor grand daughter and confined her in their house. It is alleged that she was kept in the maternal village of the petitioner.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Later on, the statement of the victim was recorded

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16071 of 2024(3) dt.19-04-2024 2/3 u/s 164 Cr.P.C., in which, though she has supported the prosecution case but has not stated any physical assault by the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 21.11.2023. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No.77 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be own close relative of the petitioner who will give on affidavit genealogy as to how he is relative to petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (2) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16071 of 2024(3) dt.19-04-2024 3/3 (3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in the court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (5) The petitioner shall appear before the Police Station of his local area in the first week of each month till the disposal of the present case.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T