← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16094/2023bail granted

Ramanand Yadav @ Ramanand Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16094 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2020 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAMANAND YADAV @ RAMANAND RAY S/O LATE KHUB LAL YADAV R/v- Chargaha Dhatiya Tola, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran 2.

PANNALAL YADAV @ PANNALAL RAY S/O LATE KHUB LAL YADAV R/v- Chargaha Dhatiya Tola, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran 3.

PUNYADEO YADAV @ PUNDEV RAY S/O RAMANAND YADAV @ RAMANAND RAY R/v- Chargaha Dhatiya Tola, P.S.- Turkauliya, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-05-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.456 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant, resulting in him sustaining injuries.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16094 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 2/3 have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having a clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the injuries found upon the person of the informant, as is apparent from the impugned order dated 21.01.2023, are simple in nature, hence benefit of doubt be granted to the petitioners for the purposes of grant of anticipatory bail.

Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the fact that the injuries found upon the person of the informant, attributable to the petitioners herein, are simple in nature, apart from the fact that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners herein to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16094 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 3/3 the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.456 of 2020, subject to the conditions as stipulated under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/sonalU T