Arun Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1796 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2019 Thana- SC/ST District- Banka ====================================================== ARUN SHARMA Son of Late Vidho Sharma Resident of Village - Maheshadih, P.S.- Banka, District - Banka.

... ... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Brij Nandad Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Usha Kumari, Spl. P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks after start of the physical Court.

Heard the parties in virtual Court proceeding. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 17.06.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Banka in connection with SC/ST Case No. 33 of 2019, G.R. No. 114 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C., and Section 3(i)(r) of the SC/ST Act.

Considering the nature of allegation against the appellant and completion of the investigation, let the appellant, above named, who is in custody since 15.06.2020, be released

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1796 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 2/2 on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) shahzad/- U T