Jay Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22822 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-417 Year-2020 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== JAY PRAKASH SINGH, SON OF JAGNARAYAN SINGH R/O VILLAGEAAMAR, P.S.- KALYAN BIGHA, DISTRICT- NALANDA. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ganesh Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP For the Bank :
Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Harnaut P. S. Case No. 417 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22822 of 2021(7) dt.16-05-2022 2/3 At the outset, Shri Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Bank of India submits that the Central Bank of India is nowhere connected with the present case neither any complaint has been made or F.I.R. has been lodged by any of the Banks' Officer and as such the present bail application may be heard separately.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 12.04.2022, the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/- out of total amount of Rs. 6,00,000/-, which has fraudulently taken by the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner further submits that he is ready to deposit Rs. 3,00,000/- in the court below if provisional bail be granted to the petitioner subject to the said condition.
Learned counsel for the informant has affirmed the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs. 50,000/- out of the total amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the aforesaid specific submission of Shri Ganesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22822 of 2021(7) dt.16-05-2022 3/3 petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Harnaut P. S. Case No. 417 of 2020, subject to the that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- and the provisional bail shall be confirmed if the petitioner makes deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- along with the interest which has accrued on total amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- within a further period of three months. If such deposits are finally paid by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be made absolute on such terms and conditions (Purnendu Singh, J) skm/- U T