Sarbdeep Paswan Ward Sachiv @ Sarpdeep Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13891 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2021 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Sarbdeep Paswan Ward Sachiv @ Sarpdeep Paswan Son of Hari Lal Paswan Resident of Village - Chakasaraf Ward No. 9, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant (Panchayat Sachiv) alleges that petitioner was the Ward Sachiv and an amount of Rs.14,50,000/-was transferred in the account of the petitioner and the Ward Member for completing the work under Mukhya Mantri Gramin Pay Jal Yojana but then the work was not completed and the amount was misappropriated.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13891 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/3 informant. It is further submitted that specific pleading has been made at para 7 of the anticipatory bail application that work was being done through the Mukhiya by an authorized agency and the work has been completed but then the FIR came to be instituted in haste. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Samastipur (M) P.S. Case No. 58 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13891 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 3/3 is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T