Tipu Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22380 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE District- Khagaria ====================================================== TIPU KUMAR SAH SON OF LATE SATYA NARAYAN SAH R/O VILLAGE- BITHAN, P.S.- BITHAN, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.
NUTAN KUMARI D/O MANGAN SAH, WIFE OF TIPU SAH R/O VILLAGE- CHHOTI BALHA, P.S.- MANSI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 374C/2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
This case relates to torture and harassment due to nonfulfillment of four wheeler as further dowry demand and finally husband of the complainant and his family members ousted her from matrimonial home after snatching her belongings.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22380 of 2021(3) dt.03-01-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the complainant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the complainant. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.
Learned APP appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 374C/2018 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Khagaria subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U