Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2024 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Satynarayan Ray @ Bilat Rai R/o vill- Litiyahi Ward No. 9, P.S.- Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.), District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 204 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(3)(, 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police, on the basis of secret information that some criminals have assembled at the place of occurrence, raided the place and recovered various arms and ammunitions. It is further alleged that one country-made pistol and one live cartridge has been recovered from this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11315 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 2/3 incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.10.2024 and has three criminal antecedents but in one case police have submitted final form and the petitioner has not been sent up for trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 204 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11315 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T