Manoj Kumar Sahni @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22856 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2020 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Sahni @ Ravi, aged about 33 years, Male Son of Sri Ram Pratap Sahni, Resident of village- Harpur Barheta, P.S.- Sarairanjan, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2021 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No.147 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under Sections 392 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in brief is that while the informant was returning to his house and when reached near Tataili Tinmuhani, three miscreants intercepted the vehicle of the informant and on the point of pistol they snatched the splendor plus bike bearing registration no. BR-33T-6, bag containing laptop of lenovo company, finger print machine, cheque book, passbook, four ATM cards, miscellaneous papers

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22856 of 2021(2) dt.24-11-2021 2/3 and cash of Rs. 55,000/-.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is not name in the FIR and his name was surfaced in the confessional statement of one co-accused Harendra Sahni, from whose possession the above articles were recovered. The further case of the petitioner is that up till now no TIP has been held by the police and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.11.2020. He further submits that the petitioner has a clean antecedent and may be released on bail. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the FIR and the impugned order, it appears that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is not named in the FIR, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., 3rd Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 147 of 2020, subject to following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22856 of 2021(2) dt.24-11-2021 3/3

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Purnendu Singh, J.) Anand Kr.

U T