Baddsah @ Badsah v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12647 of 2015 (3) dt.30-06-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12647 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2014 Thana -AWADPUR District- KATIHAR ======================================================
1. Baddsah @ Badsah Son of Laal Mohammad resident of village - Gawaltoli, P.S. Abadpur, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Kr. Ranjit Ranjan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 30.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Abadpur P. S. case no. 58/2014 registered under section 376 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Admittedly, petitioner happens to be younger brother-in-law of the informant. There is accusation against the petitioner that he committed rape on the informant but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that after marriage when the informant came to her matrimonial home, she did not like her husband and left her matrimonial home. Further it is pointed out that when husband of the informant went to take her back, she refused to come at her matrimonial home and, thereafter, husband of the informant filed matrimonial suit for restitution of his conjugal rights and a Panchyati was also held. It is contended by him that the informant lodged this
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12647 of 2015 (3) dt.30-06-2015 false case with an intent to put pressure upon the petitioner as well as his family members.
Para 8 of the case diary reveals that statement of father of the informant was recorded by the Investigating officer in course of investigation and father of the informant admitted factum of panchayati.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Abadpur P. S. case no. 58/2014 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T