Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12430/2025dismissed

Shyam Kumar @ Saini Ram @ Shyam Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-07Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12430 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Shyam Kumar @ Saini Ram @ Shyam Ram Son of Sri Bhagwan Ram Resident of Village- Itmadi, P.s.- Beldaur, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyanshu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beldour P.S. Case No. 384 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304 of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case the informant who is the Sector Manager of the Swabhiman Finance Company was robbed of Rs. 1,07,470/- by unknown criminals. The petitioner and other co-accused have been caught. There is recovery of Rs. 43,000/- cash, one Android mobile phone, two live cartridges and one country made pistol from the petitioner. From the co-accused Akash Kumar, Rs. 20,000/- and one unnumbered pulsar motorcycle have been recovered. The petitioner is in jail since 05.11.2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12430 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics and the recovered money belongs to the petitioner.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. I have considered the submission of the parties.

7. The petitioner is involved in loot and there is recovery of part of the looted money from the petitioner, this application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T