Aryan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15745 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2023 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Aryan Kumar Son of Late Domi Singh R/o Village- Beldaur ward No.8, P.S.- Beldaur, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Beldour P.S. Case no. 142 of 2023 registered under sections 307, 326 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his son was taken away by accused Manish Kumar and Satish Kumar on motorcycle. He saw the three of them going away. Subsequently he received information on telephone from one Pankaj Sharma that his son had sustained bullet injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. No incriminating material has transpired against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15745 of 2024(3) dt.24-04-2024 2/2 him. He is in custody since 21.7.2023 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. In reference to the material that has transpired in course of investigation, learned APP for the State submits that the statement of the injured son of the informant has been recorded in paragraph no. 35 of the case diary wherein describing the occurrence he has stated that the petitioner had fired upon him.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R, the material that has transpired in course of investigation wherein the petitioner is said to have fired upon the son of the informant leading to gun short injury, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T