Ranjit Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12277 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1283 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== RANJIT SHARMA Son of Late Nawal Kishore Sharma Resident of Dhobadih, P.O.- Dhansar, P.S.- Bank More, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand), at present resident of Rose Villaey Appartment, Room No. 904,9th Floor Gurudwara Road, Churu,P.S.- Chas, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bishwajeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he had taken money from opposite party no.2 but he had not returned back the said amount to other side for which present complaint petition is filed against him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12277 of 2022(3) dt.18-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is a matter related to the money dispute and business transaction between the parties. He submits that the petitioner and complainant are relatives and during the solemnization of marriage of the sister, the petitioner received amount from the complainant as help. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1283 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T