← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18610/2016disposed

Rajendra Rao v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-06-20Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18610 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajendra Rao s/o Late Hazari Rao R/o Vill.- Jagiraha, P.S. - Balther, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Mines and Minerals Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.

The Mines Development Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 6.

The Assistant Mines Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 7.

The Authorised Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Deputy Director, Balmiki Tiger Project, Ch 8.

The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur.

9.

The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 10.

The DRM, East Central Railway, Sonpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Bharti Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sunil Kr.Mandal-SC-3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard Ms. Bharti Rai, learned Counsel for the petitioner who is representing Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on record as also learned State Counsel. The present petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent no. 4 to dispose of Forest Appeal bearing CRM No. 27 of 2012-13 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 29.12.2012 passed by the respondent no. 7 in Confiscation Case No. 14 of 2010.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18610 of 2016(3) dt.20-06-2023 2/2 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 to 7 enclosing Annexure- A according to which, the matter has already been disposed of on 18.03.2017. A copy of which was already given to the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

In that view of the matter, the petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U