Santosh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11714 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== SANTOSH SAHANI Son of Shankar Sahani Resident of Village - Tikuliya, P.S. Pipara, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one stolen mobile from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11714 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U