Shyam Bihari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4881 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17477 of 2014 ====================================================== Shyam Bihari Prasad Son of Sri Ram Kishun Prasad Resident of VillageRajapur, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and ors through Sri Arun Kumar Singh, Name of Father not Known to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sindhai Bhawan,Patna 2.

Sri Kameshwar Choudhary, name of Father not Known to the Petitiner, the Chief Engineer, WaterResources Department (now, Known as Sinchai Srijan) Dehri (Rohtas) 3.

Sri Rameshwar Paswan name of father not known to the Petitioner, the Superintending Engineer, Sone Canal Modernisation Circle, Dehri 4.

Sri Om prakash, name of Fateher not Known to the Petitioner, the Executive Engineer, Sone Barrage Division, Indrapuri (Rohtas) 5.

Sri Ashok Kumar Name of Father not Known to the Petitioner, the Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Vikramganj 6.

Sri Devendra Singh name of Father not Known to the Petitioner, the Superintending Engineer, Sone Circle, Ara (Bhhojpur) 7.

Sri Mahanth Swaroop, name of Father not Known to Petitioner the District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas 8.

Smt. Mani K. name of the Father not Known to the Petitioner the Accoutant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

Patna High Court MJC No.4881 of 2018(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 30.01.2016 passed in CWJC No. 17477 of 2014."

3. The show cause of the opposite party contains memo no.6108 dated 16.08.2016 which shows that the claim of the petitioner stands disposed of.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U