Tabis Quraishi @ Tavish Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17211 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2023 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Tabis Quraishi @ Tavish Quraishi S/O Tawfic Quraishi R/O Muradabad, P.SSasaram Mufassil, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Ruhi Khatoon D/O Garib Nawaz Khan R/O Muradabad, P.S- Sasaram Mufassil, Distt.- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2024 Heard Mr. Md. Fazle Karim, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State and Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Sasaram Mufassil P.S.Case No.56 of 2023, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is informed by the learned counsel for the parties that the mediation has failed.

4. Appearance of Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, learned counsel for the informant, who has vehemently opposed, is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17211 of 2024(5) dt.29-11-2024 2/2 recorded.

5. In view of the allegation that the petitioner has assaulted the informant is general and omnibus, as well as, considering the fact that the informant has made specific allegation against her 'Dewar' and the demand of dowry is not substantiated, the petitioner is directed to be released on prearrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court, in connection with Sasaram Mufassil P.S.Case No.56 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U