Nagina Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22046 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-490 Year-2020 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

NAGINA CHAUDHARY Son of Sumirak Chaudhary Resident of Village - Korman, P.S.- Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad 2.

Ajit Chaudhary Son of Sumirak Chaudhary Resident of Village - Korman, P.S.- Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 490 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the I.P.C. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners is innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to village politics. Further he submits that petitioners and informant are co-villagers. Further he submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioners by contending that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 22046 of 2021(2) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 petitioners are named in the first information report. There is direct allegation of assault against the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners do not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is rejected. shailendra/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T