Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9310/2015rejected

Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-09Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9310 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -128 Year- 2002 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Ajay Singh Son of Sri Rameshwar Singh, resident of village- Rajapur, P.O.- Aakadua, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ramdhir Singh, Son of Late Ram Naresh Singh

3. Sangeeta Devi, D/o Late Ram Nagina Singh, W/o Ajay Kumar Singh Both residents of Village- Itwa, P.O.- Karup, P.S.- Karakat (Goarai), District- Rohtas .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Ray For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 128 of 2002 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the D.P Act against the petitioner. Petitioner happens to be husband of the victim and admittedly, the complaint case was filed in the year 2002 but petitioner came before this Court in the year 2015 therefore, considering the previous conduct of the petitioner , I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9310 of 2015 (2) dt.09-03-2015 2/2 accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 128 of 2002, pending in the court of SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj ( Rohtas) stands rejected.

However, it is made clear that if, petitioner surrenders before the court below and seeks regular bail within four weeks from today the regular bail application of the petitioner shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order, particularly, after verifying this fact as to whether any process had been served upon the petitioner or not after taking of cognizance.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Namita/- U T