Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12437/2025bail rejected

Shubham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12437 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Shubham Kumar S/o- Upendra @ Upendar Kumar Suman RO VillageJamuawan Tola Tickar Par PS- Waziganj District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Syed Asgher Najmi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was returning to the Branch office of the Company after collecting Rs.2,21,270/-, in the meantime, two unknown miscreants hit him as a result of which he fell down. Thereafter, on the point of arms, both accused persons assaulted the informant and snatched his bag containing aforesaid cash.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner's name has come in this case during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mundrika Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12437 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that during investigation materials indicating petitioner's involvement in the offence, has been collected. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of Excise Act.

6. Considering the nature of allegation and the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T