Munna Razak And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9590 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -485 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Munna Razak, Son of Rajeshwar Rajak, Resident of Mohalla- Robao Colony, Ranchi Road, P.S. Mandu, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand).

2. Veeraj Kumar @ Biraj Kumar, Son of Binay Kumar, Resident of Mohalla- Itawan Road, Railway Colony, P.S.- Mandu, DistrictRamgarh (Jharkhand).

3. Jitendra Viswakarma, Son of late Ravindra Viswakarma, Resident of Mohalla- Shivpuri Colony, Itawa Road, P.S.- Mandu, DistrictRamgarh, (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No.485 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 414 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that they are creating forged documents in order to facilitate to the Truck Driver carrying goods from one place to another place, however, nothing has been recovered from their possession, apart from that one Samsung Mobile and some money have been recovered from them. The petitioners are in custody for about three months and the other co-accused persons, having similar allegation, have

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9590 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/3 already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 10.03.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.9699 of 2017 and dated 18.03.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.13167 of 2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of submissions, as stated above, and also considering the fact that two other coaccused persons have been granted bail by this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No.485 of 2016. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9590 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 3/3