Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11985 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2023 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Kumar Singh S/O Late Ganesh Singh R/O Village- Kalupur, P.S- Parash Bigha, Distt.- Jehanabad. 2.
Mantu Kumar S/O Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Kumar Singh R/O VillageKalupur, P.S- Parash Bigha, Distt.- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant bail application has been filed in terms of the liberty granted to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge by an order dated 18.01.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.71550 of 2024. The learned counsel next submits that on account of lack of proper instruction in Cr. Misc. No. 71550/2024 it was not pleaded that charges against the petitioners was framed on 30.10.2024 itself. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. it would manifest that no specific
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11985 of 2025(2) dt.26-03-2025 2/2 allegation is alleged against the petitioners of committing the murder of the deceased. It is next submitted that petitioners are uncle and cousin brother of the deceased and were having dispute relating to property.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Trial No.546 of 2024, arising out of Paras Bigha P.S. Case No.20/2024.
6. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioners after their release are trying to delay the trial in any manner, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after recording reason.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T