Pervez Alam v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Pradip Kumar, The Collector Cum District Magistrate,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4939 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21904 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.
Pervez Alam S/o Md. Yaqub Resident of Mohalla- Darjee Patti, P.S. and P.O.- Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
2.
Md. Nazeer S/o Late Md. Sabir Ali Resident of Mohalla- Darjee Patti, P.S. and P.O.- Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through Sri Pradip Kumar, The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Purnia.
2.
Sri Pradip Kumar, The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Purnia. 3.
Sri Rakesh Kumar, The Special Officer, Agriculture Produce Marketing Board (Disintegrated)-cum-Sub-Divisional Officer, Banmankhi, DistPurnia. 4.
Sri Vishal Sharma, The Superintendent of Patna, Purnia. 5.
Sri Bibhash Kumar, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
6.
Sri Ravi Shankar Sharma, the Circle Officer, Banmankhi Circle, Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
7.
Sri Anmol Kumar, The Officer-in-Charge, Banmankhi Police Station, Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
8.
Ravindra Kumar Ray, The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (Disintegrated) Pant Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam Aag 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
This is an application for initiation of a contempt
Patna High Court MJC No.4939 of 2018(3) dt.08-01-2020 2/2 proceeding against the opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 for willful and deliberate violation of the judicial order dated 04.02.2016 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 21904 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the opposite party no. 2 and 3 have been directed to act in accordance with law.
In our considered view, it cannot be said that the respondents have not taken any action, much less that their act is contumacious in any manner.
As such, the application is disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U