Vishwanath Ram @ Sukeshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10678 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2023 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vishwanath Ram @ Sukeshwar Ram S/O Late Sukhi Ram R/O Vill - Raghopur West, P.S.- Jurawanpur, Distt- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. case No. 151 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that all the accused persons including this petitioner assaulted the informant, her son, her husband and her mother-in-law. It is further alleged that Vishwanath Ram (petitioner herein) assaulted on the head of the informant by iron rod and he fell on the ground and later on, died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10678 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no repetition of blows and therefore, the petitioner had no intention to commit murder of the deceased. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2024 and has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that there is specific accusation against the petitioner of assaulting the deceased and, thus, the petitioner does not deserve bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and there being specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T