Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9194/2017bail granted

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9194 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA RAIL P.S. District- SARAN ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Yadav, son of Ram Subagh Yadav @ Ram Suhag Yadav, resident of village - Muktapur, Police Station Kalyanpur, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Chapra Rail P.S.Case No. 69 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(A) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only allegation against the petitioner of alleged recovery of 12 litres of country made liquor from his possession and he has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for more than one month. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for more than one month, let the petitioner, above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9194 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Sonepur (Saran), in connection with Chapra Rail P.S.Case No. 69 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U