Md. Murad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12767 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- VAINI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Murad Son of Md. Israil Resident of Village - Bherokhra, P.S.- Tajpur, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 305 and 331(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. It is alleged that some unknown miscreants committed theft of Rs.58,000/- from the house of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to local village politics. Further submission is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has been transpired during the course of investigation. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No T.I.P. has been conducted. The charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation. Similarly situated co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12767 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 persons, namely, Shivam Kumar and Md. Shabir @ Md. Shaabir have already been granted regular bail by different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 24.11.2025 and 10.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 78579 of 2025 and 73500 of 2025 respectively. Petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2025. Petitioner has got three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. He undertakes to co-operate in the trial. There is no chance of tampering with the evidence or absconding of the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail and period of custody undergone, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur/concerned Court in connection with Waini P.S. Case No. 33 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T