Kaushal Kishore Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2970 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Kaushal Kishore Pandey S/o Late Sri Suresh Pandey, Resident of Village - Ganjpar, Mission Chowk, P.S.- Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura. 2.
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar S/o Late Vimal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village - Kurauni, P.S. - Korma, District - Sheikhpura. 3.
Sanjay Kumar, S/o Late Rajendra Singh, Resident of Village - Kemra, P.S. - Ariyari, District - Sheikhpura.
4.
Deepak Kumar, S/o Late Kailash Yadav, Resident of Village - Survir, P.S. - Maharajganj, District - Siwan.
5.
Kumari Annu Prabha, D/o Late - Ram Narayan Prasad, Resident of Village - Pakrandha, P.S. - Rani Talab, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
4.
The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura. 5.
The Deputy Collector, Eastablishment, Collecorate, Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura.
6.
The D.C.L.R. Officer, Sheikhpura.
7.
The District Supply Officer, Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura. 8.
The Circle Officer, Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura. 9.
The Circle Officer, Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Nasrul Huda Khan, SC-1 Ms.Babita Kumari, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-07-2023 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2.
Petitioners seek a direction for consideration and
Patna High Court CWJC No.2970 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2023 2/2 grant of pay scale as per their representation Annexure-12, in terms of orders passed in respect of other similar claims. 3.
Since the application has been made before the District Magistrate, Sheikhpura, and is to be considered by the District Magistrate in accordance with law, the limited grievance of the petitioners is that the District Magistrate has not considered the same till date. Writ petition, therefore, need not be kept pending.
4.
The writ application is disposed of with direction to The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura (Respondent No.4) to consider the petitioners' claim as contained in Annexure-12 and pass a reasoned and speaking order paying dues, if found admissible, within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shashank/- U