Md. Saiyed Ali @ Bholka @ Saiyed Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2025 Thana- ABADPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Saiyed Ali @ Bholka @ Saiyed Ali S/O Md. Farid @ Kuriya @ Furiya @ Farid Resident of village- Naya Tola Belwa, PS- Abadpur, Distt-Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Abadpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had secret information that smack was being carried by the miscreants and on this information, the police started vehicle checking. It is further alleged that two persons on a bike started fleeing away. They were chased. Further, the case of the prosecution is that one person was apprehended, whereas the other managed to escape. The apprehended person was identified as Md. Akhtar and from his possession, a total of 203.87 grams of smack-like contraband was recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12105 of 2026(3) dt.23-03-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the apprehended accused, namely, Md. Akhtar has disclosed the name of this petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather, the recovery, if any, has been made from the possession of the co-accused, namely, Md. Akhtar. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.12.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Katihar in connection with Abadpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T