Sheojee Rai @ Sheoji Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11559 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2013 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== SHEOJEE RAI @ SHEOJI RAI Son of Late Raghunath Rai Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S- Garkha, distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with S.Tr. No. 101 of 2014 arising out of Garkha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 341, 324, 307, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submit that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and in the instant case petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2013 i.e. for more than five years.
Considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and period of custody of the petitioner, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11559 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Chapra, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2013, subject to the conditions that his both bailors should be family members and further the petitioner shall extend full co-operation in conclusion of the trial and in the event petitioner neglects the proceeding or cause delay in conclusion of the trial and without any cogent reason failed to attend the Court proceeding on two consecutive days, the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U T