Hari Kishore Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12297 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2021 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Hari Kishore Rai Son Of Jaynarayan Ray Resident Of Village - Paraspur Mushahari, P.O. And P.S. - Kathaiya, District - Muzaffarpur. 2.

Rambabu Rai Son Of Harikishore Ray Resident Of Village - Paraspur Mushahari, P.O. And P.S. - Kathaiya, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 14170 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2021 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Shyambabu Rai @ Shyam Kumar Son Of Resident Of Village - Paraspur Mushahari, P.O. And P.S. - Kathaiya, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12297 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 14170 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12297 of 2022(2) dt.04-08-2022 2/3 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the husband of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence and only on suspicion, petitioners have been made accused. He further submits that petitioners have four criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that a day before occurrence, petitioner Rambabu has taken the informant's husband from his house. There are allegation of land grabby and outraging the modesty of the informant.

Considering the seriousness of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 26 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12297 of 2022(2) dt.04-08-2022 3/3