← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14447/2019allowed

Dinesh Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-17Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14447 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2018 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

DINESH YADAV AND ORS Son of Vyas Choudhary Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj 2.

Munna Yadav Son of Vyas Choudhary Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj 3.

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Yadav Son of Basant Yadav Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj 4.

Awadhesh Yadav Son of Late Hirala Yadav Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj 5.

Pradeep Yadav Son of Dharmnath Yadav Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj 6.

Rohit Kumar Son of Dhananjay Yadav Resident of Village - Arwan Durg, P.S.- Hathuwa, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 192 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14447 of 2019(4) dt.17-06-2019 2/2 and have not committed any offence. In fact, the parties have previous enmity and on account of that case and counter case have been lodged by both the parties. Hence, the petitioners may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioners in the event of surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 192 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T