← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13672/2017bail granted

Kailash Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13672 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2016 Thana -MUSHARIGHARARI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Kailash Kumar Mahto Son of Raj Kumar Mahto, Resident of VillageBarabatta, P.S.- Musharigharai, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Roy For the State : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara For the informant : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the informant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner seeks bail in Musharigharari P.S. case No. 83 of 2016 under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Later on Section 302 of the IPC was added. Indu Devi named the petitioner along with other accused persons and alleged that they all, having armed with different weapons came. Kailash Kumar Mahto, the petitioner, asked the informant that her nephew committed theft of his mobile. The informant retorted that her nephew did not steal the mobile and asked the accused persons to search her house. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13672 of 2017 (4) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 accused persons begun to abuse. The petitioner assaulted the husband of informant, Rajendra Mahto, repeatedly with Lathi. It is further alleged that Sanjay Kumar Mahto assaulted Vijay Kumar Biswas, the nephew of the informant, and Vijay Kumar Biswas died during the course of treatment.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is counter version being Musharigharari P.S. case No. 86 of 2016. The petitioner is not the assailant of the deceased. The petitioner is said to have assaulted Rajendra Mahto, who got simple injuries, as stated in paragraph 49 of the case diary. Considering the facts that petitioner is not the assailant of Bijay Kumar Biswas, the deceased, the petitioner assaulted Rajendra Mahto, who got simple injuries, and for that the petitioner is in jail since 05.12.2016, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial MagistrateIV, Samastipur in Musharigharari P.S. Case No. 83 of 2016. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T