Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10688/2015rejected

Shiv Shankar Prasad @Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-29Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10688 of 2015 (5) dt.29-06-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10688 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2014 Thana -HASPURA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Shiv Shankar Prasad @ Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Awadhesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Umga, P.S. - Madanpur, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Bank Mr. Mahesh Nr. Parbat, Sr. Advocate Mr Arun Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State Mr. Abhay Kumar No. 1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05/ 29.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Haspura P. S. case no. 126/2014 registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420,409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation against the petitioner is that being Branch Manager, he transferred bank money to the account of his wife preparing forged vouchers.

Learned counsel for the Bank submits that on the same day Obra P. S. case no. 150/2014 was registered against the petitioner for similar type of occurrence and even after institution of both the above stated cases, petitioner committed same type of offence for which Mali P. S. case no. 14/2015 was registered against him.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10688 of 2015 (5) dt.29-06-2015 Regard being had to the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with the above stated case stands rejected. However, if the petitioner makes any petition for granting permission to deposit amount in question with compoundable interest without admitting the prosecution case, the concerned court shall consider the aforesaid prayer and pass appropriate order on the petition.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T