Santu Mandal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7429 of 2017 (2) dt.20-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7429 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2013 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Santu Mandal
2. Pulkit Mandal Both sons of Late Sita Ram Mandal, R/o village- Udaypur, Kala Rampur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Dass For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.
Petitioners seek bail in connection with Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegedly, the petitioners and others surrounded the husband of the informant and firearm injury was caused to the husband of the informant by co-accused Mirtyunjay Yadav @ Tara Yadav who is not the petitioner before this Court. Submission is of false implication and that the post mortem report reflects only one firearm injury to the victim, the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent, however, they were accused in Sessions Trial No. 944 of 2014 arising out of Bariyarpur P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7429 of 2017 (2) dt.20-03-2017 No. 27 of 2013 wherein they have been acquitted. Similarly situated accused Sunil Mandal has been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 400 of 2014 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioners are suffering in custody since 28.04.2016 and as such the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration. Learned APP submits that the petitioners are named in the first information report.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that co-accused Sunil Mandal has been allowed bail, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Munger in Sessions Trial No. 298 of 2016 arising out of Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T