Ganesh Bhar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13711 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Ganesh Bhar Son of Rati Bhar Resident of village- Dhanwahiya (Khalwapatti) Police Station- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. 2.
Bhola Bhar Son of Saginder Bhar Resident of village- Dhanwahiya (Khalwapatti) Police Station- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. 3.
Sukhari Bhar @ Sukhari Kumar Rajbhar Son of Mahesh Bhar Resident of village- Dhanwahiya (Khalwapatti) Police Station- Dhanha, District- West Champaran.
4.
Ajay Bhar Son of Ganesh Bhar Resident of village- Dhanwahiya (Khalwapatti) Police Station- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 191(2), 190 of the B.N.S.
3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the brother and son of the informant with sword and farsa.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case on account of some petty dispute with regard to the fact that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13711 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/3 buffalo of the petitioners had entered into the premises of the informant for which cases have been filed from both the sides and Annexure-P/2 is the case filed on behalf of the wife of the petitioner no. 1. It is further submitted that the First Information Report lodged by the informant has also been filed after a delay of 3 days for which no explanation has been tendered. Further, it will be apparent from the bail rejection order that the injuries received by the injured persons are simple in nature. The petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the similar nature of dispute upon which the entire incident took place coupled with the factum of simple nature of injuries, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhanha
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13711 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 3/3 P.S. Case No. 362 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to the conditions that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Agency and cooperate in the investigation. (Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T